Richard Jungmann, Ph.D.

Instructor

  • Milwaukee WI UNITED STATES
  • Allen Bradley Hall of Science: S110
  • Mechanical Engineering

Dr. Richard Jungmann is an expert in the areas of product and systems design, mechanics and materials.

Contact

Education, Licensure and Certification

Ph.D.

Mechanical Engineering

Marquette University

1992

M.S.

Mechanical Engineering

Marquette University

1986

B.S.

Mechanical Engineering

Marquette University

1984

Biography

Dr. Richard Jungmann is an adjunct associate professor in MSOE's Mechanical Engineering Department. He teaches courses in both the undergraduate and graduate programs, including Statics, Dynamics, Applied Strength of Materials, Mechanical Components, Mechanisms, Mechanics, Finite Element, Mechanics of Materials, Advanced Mechanics and Advanced Mechanical Systems Design. His more than 30 years of practical experience in product design and R&D allows him to connect the course material to real world applications. He is a capstone advisor for both undergraduate and graduate students' final projects, and serves on MSOE's Mechanical Engineering Advisory Committee.

Areas of Expertise

Mechanical Components
Finite Element Analysis
Mechanical Engineering
Simulations
Standby Generators

Affiliations

  • American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) : Member
  • Tau Beta Pi : Member
  • Pi Tau Sigma : Member

Social

Patents

Power tool, battery, charger and method of operating the same

US7814816B2

2009

A power tool includes a housing assembly having a first housing portion and a second housing portion supported for pivoting movement relative to the first housing portion about a pivot axis. The first housing portion supports a motor. The second housing portion includes a chuck for supporting a tool element. The power tool also includes a gear supported within the housing assembly for rotation relative to at least one of the first and second housing portions about the pivot axis. The gear is operable to transfer drive force from the motor to the tool element.

View more

Stud punch

US7797840B2

2007

A stud punch head for a power tool includes a head housing and a first arm movably coupled to the head housing. The first arm supports a punch. The stud punch head also includes a second arm movably coupled to the head housing and relative to the first arm. The second arm supports a die opposite the punch. The stud punch head also includes a drive mechanism positioned at least partially within the head housing and operatively coupled to a motor of the power tool. The drive mechanism is operable to move the first arm and the second arm toward and away from each other.

Keyless clamp assembly for reciprocating tool

US6237231B1

2001

A clamp for the blade of a hand held reciprocating tool includes a spindle coupled to the drive mechanism. A slot is formed in the spindle for receiving the blade tang and a collar is threadably received on the spindle. A blade clamping member is disposed between the collar and the blade and includes an engaging member for engaging a hole in the blade tang and a pair of ears which engage the upper and lower shoulders of the blade tang to provide three points of engagement when the collar is tightened. The clamp also includes a nose section which engages the blade at its junction with the tang to provide reinforcement against breakage.

View more

Show All +

Selected Publications

A variational method for evaluating thrust bearing element load distribution

Journal of Engineering for Industry

Stango, R.J., Jungmann, R.H.

1989

A variational method is outlined for computing thrust bearing element loads on the basis of minimizing the potential energy of the system. The problem is formulated in terms of a polynomial displacement assumption for bearing elements. To illustrate the computational procedure, numerical studies are presented for a thrust bearing subjected to a range of load eccentricities. The variational approach is demonstrated to result in an accurate and efficient solution for bearing element load distributions. Excellent agreement is achieved when comparison is made to conventional methods of classical bearing theory for nominal load eccentricities, while superior performance is obtained when load eccentricities are considerably larger. Basic advantages of the variational formulation are discussed and an illustrative problem is presented which demonstrates extended capability of the variational method for examining the load distribution in thrust bearings.

View more

Powered by